What Works: A Post Election Report-Back from the Mitchell Kapor Foundation

What Works: A Post Election Report-Back from the Mitchell Kapor Foundation

Feb 17 2009

On January 26 & 27, 2009, the Mitchell Kapor Foundation gathered VoICE grantees together for WHAT WORKS: A Post-Elections Report Back. WHAT WORKS provided a much-needed opportunity to share the strategies that nonprofit organizations used to inspire voter participation and protect voter access to the polls during the 2008 election cycle.

 
Click below to hear John Bonifaz recount significant victories in Pennsylvania during the 2008 election while participating in the panel discussion, 'Revitalizing Democracy'.

Audio placeholder

 

County's certified election results wrong

County's certified election results wrong

The Times-Standard Dec 4 2008

The results from the Nov. 4 election that the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors certified this week are incomplete, Humboldt County Registrar of Voters Carolyn Crnich said today.

Crnich said almost 200 ballots were inexplicably dropped from the final election results. The error did not change the outcome of any of the races, Crnich said.

View Source Here

Expert advocates paper ballots for future elections

Expert advocates paper ballots for future elections

By Myung Oak Kim Rocky Mountain News Dec 3 2008

A voting systems expert advised a state election panel Tuesday to limit the use of electronic voting machines to one per precinct to reduce the chance of sabotage or lost votes.

Dan Wallach, associate professor of computer science at Rice University, also recommended that Colorado use paper ballots counted on scanning machines.
"Hand-marked paper ballots that are machine-scanned are the best technology that's on the market today," Wallach testified at the state Election Reform Commission meeting at the state Capitol.

View Entire Article Here

Paper ballots touted as most secure

Paper ballots touted as most secure

By John Ingold The Denver Post Dec 2 2008

A computer-science professor on Monday told a panel charged with reforming Colorado's election systems that electronic voting machines like those used in some of Colorado's largest counties are unreliable and vulnerable to tampering.

Rice University professor Dan Wallach, a nationally recognized voting-machine expert, said paper ballots counted by scanning machines are much more resistant to widespread election fraud.
"In terms of the systems that are available today, hand-marked paper ballots counted by scanners are the best technology," Wallach said.

View Entire Article Here

Voters Find Long Lines, but No Catastrophes

Voters Find Long Lines, but No Catastrophes

Ian Urbina The New York Times Nov 4 2008

There were long lines, computer glitches, the occasional argument and even a few lawsuits.

But the process of voting in Tuesday’s presidential election — which may set a record for turnout — was relatively smooth, with no reports of catastrophic failures that kept large numbers of people from casting a ballot.

View Entire Article Here
Syndicate content