Alameda County, CA Letter re: Security Testing of Sequoia Voting Machines

Alameda County, CA Letter re: Security Testing of Sequoia Voting Machines

posted on: Nov 11 2007

Letter to Nancy Fenton from Robert Charles Friese

Alameda County Update

Alameda County Update

posted on: Nov 11 2007

Letter to Nancy Fenton, Deputy County Counsel Alameda County and Letter to Alameda County Board of Supervisors

Decertification/Recertification Decisions Issued August 3, 2007, by Secretary of State Debra Bowen

Decertification/Recertification Decisions Issued August 3, 2007, by Secretary of State Debra Bowen

posted on: Nov 11 2007

Secretary of State Debra Bowen began her top-to-bottom review of the voting machines certified for use in California in March 2007. The review was designed to restore the public's confidence in the integrity of the electoral process and to ensure that California voters are being asked to cast their ballots on machines that are secure, accurate, reliable, and accessible. On August 3, 2007, Secretary Bowen announced her decisions regarding which systems in the review will be permitted to be used in the 2008 elections and beyond.

Decertification/Recertification Decisions Issued by Secretary of State Debra Bowen

Diebold Election Systems, Inc.

VOTERS’ GROUP DECLARES VICTORY IN ELECTRONIC VOTING CASE

VOTERS’ GROUP DECLARES VICTORY IN ELECTRONIC VOTING CASE

Plaintiffs Applaud California Secretary of State’s Recent Action on Voting Systems -- Voter Action's Case Challenging The Use of Diebold Electronic Voting Machines Is Voluntarily Withdrawn

SACRAMENTO, CA – A group of California voters who filed suit challenging former Secretary of State Bruce McPherson’s 2006 certification of Diebold electronic voting machines for use in California announced today that they were withdrawing their court case following Secretary of State Debra Bowen’s recent decision to decertify the Diebold system and to only allow limited use of that system under strict manual recount conditions.

Alameda Voters File Suit Against County to Ensure Anti-Hacking Testing of Sequoia E-Voting Systems Before Nov. 7

Alameda Voters File Suit Against County to Ensure Anti-Hacking Testing of Sequoia E-Voting Systems Before Nov. 7

Board of Supervisors mandated “security vulnerability testing” by a third party – yet contract defers to Sequoia on testing and County Counsel can provide no proof that the system is safe from hacks

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                                                          
CONTACT:
Emma Mackinnon, Fenton Communications

California Voters Statement on Court Ruling in Continuing Suit to Block State’s Use of Diebold Touch Screen Electronic Voting

California Voters Statement on Court Ruling in Continuing Suit to Block State’s Use of Diebold Touch Screen Electronic Voting

California Voters Statement on Court Ruling in Continuing Suit to Block State’s Use of Diebold Touch Screen Electronic Voting Systems

For Immediate Release:  San Francisco, CA, September 14, 2006A group of California voters, including civil rights leader Dolores Huerta and several disabled persons, vowed to continue its lawsuit, filed on March 21, 2006, to block the State’s use of Diebold TSx DRE touch screen electronic voting systems, while expressing disappointment over today’s ruling by the California Superior Court in San Francisco, that permits the machines to be used in this November’s elections. 

Reply filings for MPI

Reply filings for MPI

posted on: Sep 7 2006

Petitioner's Reply and Declaration of Judy Alter & Jacob McPharlin In Support of Petitioner's Reply -Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Petition for Writ of Mandate and Preliminary Injunction

Alameda County Voters Demand Security Testing of Sequoia Electronic Voting Systems Prior to Payment

Alameda County Voters Demand Security Testing of Sequoia Electronic Voting Systems Prior to Payment

A group of Alameda County voters has written to the Alameda County Counsel in an effort to halt the county‘s payment for or use of the Sequoia touch screen electronic voting system in November and future elections until the system has passed independent, expert security vulnerability testing.

San Francisco, CA – A group of Alameda County voters has written to the Alameda County Counsel in an effort to halt the county‘s payment for or use of the Sequoia touch screen electronic voting system in November and future elections until the system has passed independent, expert security vulnerability testing.  The Alameda County Board of Supervisors required this testing as a condition before payment to Sequoia Voting Systems in its vote on June 8th.  In their attorney’s letter to David MacDonald, Alameda County’s Acting Registrar of Vot

Jones Support for Preliminary Injuction in State Court

Jones Support for Preliminary Injuction in State Court

posted on: Aug 8 2006

California Voters File New Motion of Preliminary Injunction in State Court to Halt Use of Electronic Voting Systems

Voter Action Press Release

California Voters File New Motion of Preliminary Injunction in State Court to Halt Use of Electronic Voting Systems

Aug 8 2006 | California voters challenging the use of Diebold touch screen voting systems today filed a motion for preliminary injunction in San Francisco Superior Court, asking the Court to prohibit purchase or use in California of Diebold Accuvote TSx electronic voting machines for use in the November 2006 general election.

A hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction is expected on August 31, 2006. Defendants in the case are Secretary of State Bruce McPherson and elections officials in 11 California counties.  Elections officials in eight other California counties have been dismissed from the suit, after they signed affidavits that they will not use Diebold touch screens for the November elections.
 

Syndicate content