Petitioners' Opposition to Premier Election Solutions, Inc.

Petitioners' Opposition to Premier Election Solutions, Inc.

posted on: Oct 5 2009

County unlikely to collect in voting machine case

County unlikely to collect in voting machine case

Matt Assad The Morning Call Jan 24 2009

Northampton can't reach firm that sold faulty equipment.

Sitting in a storeroom at Northampton County's voter registration office are 600 worthless voting machines the county paid $2.1 million to get.

View Entire Article Here

Pa. high court allows voting-machine suit to proceed

Pa. high court allows voting-machine suit to proceed

By Amy Worden Inquirer Harrisburg Bureau Dec 20 2008

HARRISBURG - The fate of electronic voting machines used in most Pennsylvania counties will be decided by a state court.

A decision by the state Supreme Court this week denying an appeal filed by the secretary of the commonwealth clears the way for Commonwealth Court to determine whether touch-screen machines violate the state election code.

View Entire Article Here

Voting-machine challenge back on track

Voting-machine challenge back on track

By David Singleton The Times Tribune Dec 18 2008

A lawsuit challenging the use of electronic voting machines is back on track after a 20-month detour in the state Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court cleared the way for the case to proceed Tuesday, when it denied Secretary of the Commonwealth Pedro Cortes permission to appeal an April 2007 ruling by Commonwealth Court that said voters may contest the legality of the widely used — and increasingly controversial — electronic voting systems.

View Entire Article Here

PENNSYLVANIA STATE SUPREME COURT ALLOWS VOTING RIGHTS CASE TO PROCEED

Voter Action Press Release

PENNSYLVANIA STATE SUPREME COURT ALLOWS VOTING RIGHTS CASE TO PROCEED

Dec 18 2008 | State’s Highest Court Denies Pennsylvania Secretary of State Permission to Appeal Lower Court Ruling in Voters’ Favor Case Challenging the Use of Electronic Voting Machines Now Moves Toward Trial PHILADELPHIA, PA – Pennsylvania voters challenging the continued use of unverifiable electronic voting machines in their state won another major round on Tuesday when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a ruling allowing their case to proceed toward trial. The state’s highest court, in a one-sentence order, denied the Pennsylvania Secretary of State’s petition seeking permission to appeal a lower court ruling decided in the voters’ favor. In April 2007, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania had ruled that voters have a right under the Pennsylvania Constitution to reliable and secure voting systems and can challenge the use of electronic voting machines “that provide no way for Electors to know whether their votes will be recognized” through voter verification or independent audit. Following that ruling, Pennsylvania Secretary of State Pedro Cortés filed his petition before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and further proceedings in the case, Banfield v. Cortés, had been suspended pending the outcome of the petition. The order issued on Tuesday gives a green light for the voters to pursue their claims.

“We now look forward to moving this case toward trial,” says Mary Kohart, a partner at Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, one of the lawyers representing the voters. “There is overwhelming evidence showing that electronic voting machines are unreliable and insecure for the counting and recording of votes. We are pleased that our clients will now have the

Memorandum of Law of Respondent to Petitioners Motion to Dissolve

Memorandum of Law of Respondent to Petitioners Motion to Dissolve

posted on: Apr 15 2008

Petitioners Motion to Dissolve Voluntary Stay of Proceeding

Petitioners Motion to Dissolve Voluntary Stay of Proceeding

posted on: Apr 15 2008

and to set a discovery and trial schedule

Petitioners Reply Brief in Further Support of Their Motion to Lift Stay

Petitioners Reply Brief in Further Support of Their Motion to Lift Stay

posted on: Apr 15 2008

Respondent Answer to Petitioners Feb 22 Motion to Dissolve

Respondent Answer to Petitioners Feb 22 Motion to Dissolve

posted on: Apr 15 2008

Court Order

Court Order

posted on: Apr 14 2008

regarding Petitioner's motion to dissolve voluntary stay of proceedings

Syndicate content