What Works: A Post Election Report-Back from the Mitchell Kapor Foundation

What Works: A Post Election Report-Back from the Mitchell Kapor Foundation

Feb 17 2009

On January 26 & 27, 2009, the Mitchell Kapor Foundation gathered VoICE grantees together for WHAT WORKS: A Post-Elections Report Back. WHAT WORKS provided a much-needed opportunity to share the strategies that nonprofit organizations used to inspire voter participation and protect voter access to the polls during the 2008 election cycle.

 
Click below to hear John Bonifaz recount significant victories in Pennsylvania during the 2008 election while participating in the panel discussion, 'Revitalizing Democracy'.

Audio placeholder

 

Florida Primary Recount Reveals Grave Voting Problems One Month Before Presidential Election

Florida Primary Recount Reveals Grave Voting Problems One Month Before Presidential Election

By Kim Zetter, Wired Magazine
A month of primary recounts in the election battleground of Palm Beach County, Florida, has twice flipped the winner...

... in a local judicial race and revealed grave problems in the county's election infrastructure, including thousands of misplaced ballots and vote tabulation machines that are literally unable to produce the same results twice.

Voting machine snafu hits county

Voting machine snafu hits county

By Alexis Garrobo, The Beaufort Gazette
Beaufort County voters who wanted to cast early ballots Monday in the Nov. 4 general election had to cast paper ballots because voting machines weren't working.

However, some voters chose not to cast their ballots until the machines are working.

About 10 voters showed up at the election office Monday in Beaufort, but only two cast paper ballots, said Agnes Garvin, head of the county elections office, adding most decided to return when the machines are functioning.

They "will be up and running (today)," she said.

University of New Mexico - 2006 Post Election Audit

University of New Mexico - 2006 Post Election Audit

During the 2007 legislative session, the New Mexico Legislature passed a bill and Governor Richardson signed it into law, which provides for random voting system audits after every statewide general election (see 1-14-13.1, NMSA).

Specifically, the law provides that county clerks are to compare the total votes tallied in the general election for the office of president or governor from a random selection of 2% of the voting systems used during the election throughout the state to a hand count of the ballots cast on that system. A voting system is defined as a vote-tabulating machine.

Ex-elections boss, businessman too cozy, some suspect

Ex-elections boss, businessman too cozy, some suspect

By Myung Oak Kim, Rocky Mountain News
State contracts and personal contacts raise ethics questions

The close working partnership between Holly Lowder and John Paulsen has been well-known for years among Colorado county clerks and state election workers.
Lowder, who resigned as state elections director this month, helped launch Paulsen's government contractor business in 1993 when she bought his voter registration software for Alamosa County.
She was Alamosa County clerk for about 25 years and held several state leadership positions.
Paulsen, owner of LEDS LLC, went on to sell his software to more than 30 counties.

Early voting starts today in some states

Early voting starts today in some states

By Richard Wolf, USA Today
Fairfax, VA — Voters by the thousands will begin casting ballots for president this week in an early voting process that's expected to set records this year.

Residents of Virginia, Kentucky and Georgia are among the first in the nation eligible to vote in person, as well as by mail. During the next few weeks, at least 34 states and the District of Columbia will allow early in-person voting for Nov. 4 elections.

High Turnout, New Procedures May Mean an Election Day Mess

High Turnout, New Procedures May Mean an Election Day Mess

By Mary Pat Flaherty, Washington Post
Faced with a surge in voter registrations leading up to Nov. 4, election officials across the country are bracing for long lines, equipment failures and confusion over polling procedures that could cost thousands the chance to cast a ballot.

The crush of voters will strain a system already in the midst of transformation, with jurisdictions introducing new machines and rules to avoid the catastrophe of the deadlocked 2000 election and the lingering controversy over the 2004 outcome. Even within the past few months, cities and counties have revamped their processes: Nine million voters, including many in the battleground states of Ohio, Florida and Colorado, will use equipment that has changed since March.
But the widespread changes meant to reassure the public have also increased the potential for trouble.

Voter Database Glitches Could Disenfranchise Thousands

Voter Database Glitches Could Disenfranchise Thousands

By Kim Zetter, Wired Magazine

Election experts are concerned that problems with database name-matching algorithms may unfairly disqualify some voters in the upcoming election.

Electronic voting machines have been the focus of much controversy the last few years. But another election technology has received little scrutiny yet could create numerous problems and disenfranchise thousands of voters in November, election experts say.

 
This year marks the first time that new, statewide, centralized voter-registration databases will be used in a federal election in a number of states.
The databases were mandated in the 2002 Help America Vote Act, which required all election districts in a state or U.S. territory to consolidate their lists into a single database electronically accessible to every election office in the state or territory.

Ballot glitch a mystery

Ballot glitch a mystery

By Steve Urbon, Standard-Times
New Bedford — One week before the state primary, city Elections Commissioner Maria Tomasia said her office is trying to solve the puzzle of why the Automark voting machines won't work with the city's Republican ballots.

She said technicians from ES&S have about 48 hours to get the machines set up properly, and that the problem "seems to be the ink," but that nobody is certain.

Better standards urged for e-voting labs

Better standards urged for e-voting labs

By Michael Hardy, Federal Computer Week.com
The standards used by the National Institute of Standards and Technology to accredit laboratories that test electronic voting systems need to be improved, according to a new report from the Government Accountability Office.

NIST's guidelines address the relevant Help America Vote Act requirements, but leave much undefined, GAO found. For example, NIST's approach does not cite explicit qualifications for the personnel who conduct accreditation and technical assessments of the labs and, therefore, play a major role in accreditation decisions.

Syndicate content